.png)
Violent struggle: In the absence of Mahatma Gandhi, the freedom struggle might have taken a more violent turn. Without his philosophy of non-violence and civil disobedience, the movement could have turned into an armed struggle, leading to more bloodshed and casualties.
Lack of national integration: Gandhi's ability to bring people from different religions, castes, and communities together was a significant factor in the success of the freedom struggle. In his absence, the struggle might have been fragmented, with different groups fighting for their own interests rather than for the larger goal of Indian independence.
Slow pace of the freedom struggle: Gandhi's leadership and methods of peaceful protests and civil disobedience provided a momentum to the freedom struggle. Without him, the movement might have lacked direction and momentum, leading to a slower pace of progress towards independence.
Possible role of other leaders: In Gandhi's absence, other leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and Subhash Chandra Bose might have emerged as prominent leaders of the freedom struggle. Their leadership might have led to different strategies and tactics to achieve independence.
Influence of the British government: The British government might have used different tactics to suppress the freedom struggle in the absence of Gandhi. They might have employed more force, arrested more leaders, and used other methods to divide and weaken the movement.
In conclusion, the achievement of Indian independence without Mahatma Gandhi would have been different, and it is difficult to predict the exact outcome. However, it is clear that Gandhi's leadership and philosophy of non-violence and civil disobedience played a crucial role in the success of the freedom struggle.
.png)
.png&description=How different would have been the achievement of Indian independence without Mahatma Gandhi? Discuss.){kind=link}
Social Plugin